Don’t share your passwords with your partner

Does signing up for a relationship mean handing over your passwords? Dorothy Black believes personal privacy and trust need to work together.

login details

I heard a story the other day about a woman who was advised by a sex therapist to exchange phones with her husband. The therapist believed the woman’s husband was cheating on her.

To remedy this, they were advised to rifle through each others emails and messages, in what, I suppose, was a kind of trust exercise. The idea was that having access to all her husband’s info, the woman could be reassured by her husband’s fidelity. Or confirm his infidelity.

Call me crazy, but checking your husband’s phone as part of a trust exercise is a bit like hitting a dead fly with sledgehammer to see if it’s really dead.

Trust is a funny thing, you see. If you don’t have it, it’s a cold, hard world where everything looks like a cheat. Too much of it, and you’re a naïve Pollyanna-child and no cheat could be big enough for you to see it.

Clearly no one in that room had heard of private browsing

Ultimately, trust is a little game you start playing with yourself first.

So I rolled my eyes at the therapist’s suggestion. Clearly no one in that room had heard of private browsing, multiple email accounts or the delete button. Or self-awareness.

But it did get me asking women what the deal was with their personal privacy in a relationship. Do they have any? Or do they hand over their right to personal space along with their smartphone, email and social media passwords when they decide to get serious with someone?

And, I have to admit, that I was surprised at how many couples do this. Actually, let me clear: I was surprised by how many women expect to do this as a matter of course.

I shouldn’t have to use my personal spaces to placate your creeping suspicion on a daily basis

Maybe there’s something wrong with me, but when I try to picture myself in that position – of being asked to share my email or FB messages to prove I’m trustworthy – something inside me goes into ‘WHOA! mode’. I might have nothing to hide, but those boundaries go down hard.

Either you trust me or you don’t, but I shouldn’t have to use my personal spaces to placate your creeping suspicion on a daily basis.

Or do I have it wrong? I so often get the stink-eye for calling foul on couples who regularly scour the contents of each other’s daily behind-the-scenes interactions that I wonder if I’m being old-fashioned with all this ‘boundary’ business.

To be fair, I imagine that a lot of that creeping suspicion finds its way in through the cracks made by a lack of honest and regular communication. Maybe there’s a sense that what is hidden will never be willingly shared and it’s rather best to go and sniff it out for yourself.

Where does it end? Diary entries and credit card slips?

For example, let’s look at sex sites.

I’ve heard countless stories of people signing up to sex and fetish sites without their partner’s knowledge, because they just know that their partner will judge their kinks and desires and not want any part of it. Or those who ‘accidentally’ find a porn collection on their sweet honey’s hard drive and then lose their minds over ‘broken trust’.

Does being in a relationship mean you’re not ‘allowed’ to entertain your own sexual fantasies and curiosities without letting your partner in on it? Is privacy taboo when you’re attached? (Though, let’s be real, the really real issue here is why you can’t or don’t want to share this kind of stuff with your partner?)

You see, that’s the problem with blurring those boundary lines so early in the game.

If it’s starting with gaining equal-access to all their private platforms, like trawling through their emails, FB messages and Whatsapp chats, where does it end? Diary entries and credit card slips? Getting wildly distressed every time they look at a naked picture? Following them to work and friend catch-ups?

The only way to manage healthy personal space is to deal with those trust issues the moment they start wanting to poke about. The minute you feel the need to be reassured that you can trust your partner, you need to start the conversations about your faith in your self, the relationship and him.

All a password gains you is access to a can of worms in your own head.

This column was first published on Women24.com [clickety click]

***

If you click though to that, please read the lovely comments, in which i get input like this:

From Revelgen: ‘Yep, have been married for 44 years this year, still love my wife and have always been faithful to her. While we have always enjoyed our sex, our relationship hasn’t been based on this. If it is only that, then, Dorothy, unfortunately you do have a problem. Don’t mean to be unkind but it’s the hard truth. Genuine love is based on mutual trust and respect and it’s nice to see people like Paul/Jake who agree.’

Paul, btw, said he would prefer his advice from a couple ‘that know what respect, honesty and commitment is !!’ and Jake told me to stop posting rubbish and that my idea of a partner is ‘somebody that buys you a drink and then leaves before breakfast again’…

glad to know that the men on a women’s site can fucking read. and since i can’t do this on women24.com, here you go you complete and utter fucktards…

kirsten bell

Postsecret pic of the week :: I orgasm by stroking my imaginary penis

Screen Shot 2015-08-24 at 3.46.00 PM

5-monument

i’m busy with the bit about masturbating and orgasms in my book. i’m kind of 80% done with it all and have hit such a slow patch wading through the business of what women are told – by media, by this research and that research – about how they can and cannot orgasm. the main gist of it all is that orgasm is only about rubbing your clit.

well. this postsecret would disagree with that. also: wet dreams, nipple orgasms and thinking yourself to orgasm.

love the clit. love it. but there is a wiiiiiiiiiiide range of orgasm potential sitting in our brains and bodies.

also here is a lovely quote i found this week that neatly sums up what science likes to tell you is scientifically possible…

from a medical paper entitled Anatomy of sex: Revision of the new anatomical terms used for the clitoris and the female orgasm by sexologists….

‘Also, female ejaculation, premature ejaculation, persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD), periurethral glans, vaginal-cervical genitosensory component of the vagus nerve, and G-spot amplification, are terms without scientific basis…’

well, scientific or no, men and women consider ‘premature ejaculation’ a bit of a thing if he’s coming too quickly for his or her satisfaction … and those of you who experience ‘g-spot’ orgasm and shejaculation would vehemently disagree with it not really being a thing because science hasn’t figured it out yet. right?

after all, let me remind me you that ‘science and research’ have been ignoring the clit for a pretty long fucking time and have a VERY narrow band of vision when it comes to sexuality.

7-acceptance

this reminds me of a piece of info i picked up the other day, about women who lubricate when they’re being raped. the old idea is that women’s vaginas become lubricated when they’re turned on. while this is true sometimes, the body chemistry of desire isn’t this simplistic. lubrication’s main role is to ease entry by penetration so that the delicate lining on the vaginal walls is kept safe from injury and tears – whether you’re turned on or not. this means it can also kick into gear during sexual assault. there’s an easy-to-read explanation and some good clickthroughs on this page here [clickety click].

interesting ne?

happy week my darling plums.